Politics Information

Patriots and Parrots: Imprisoning Tongues in America


It can be dangerous to engage in free speech. This year alone, 242 journalists, in countries such as Egypt, Morocco, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia, have been tossed into jail for their words, and one has been killed.

Here at home, our bodies remain free, but our tongues are imprisoned. As Dan Rather stated after 9/11, "Patriotism has run amok." Reminiscent of Joe McCarthy's "red hysteria," we are told to shut up, salute the flag, and applaud White House policy during this "war on terror." Otherwise we risk being branded un-American.

Political satirist Bill Maher was publicly skewered and lost his show "Politically Incorrect." The Dixie Chicks were plucked off the radio, and a 33,000 pound tractor was used to crush their CDs in a public protest. The latest casualty in the "word witch hunt" is University of Colorado professor Ward Churchill who likened some World Trade Center victims to Nazi bureaucrat Adolf Eichmann, and who may lose his tenured position as a result. A number of journalists in America have lost their jobs.

Rather than examine the flaws or merits of their controversial speech, I will present three questions for further reflection.

First, is it patriotic to parrot the cheers choreographed by a Commander-in-Chief? Or was Thomas Jefferson correct when he wrote, "Dissent is the highest form of patriotism"?

If one believes our nation's policies to be in error, isn't the path of courage to speak out, the path of cowardice to remain silent? Should one go down with the Titanic, if one may have a strategy for keeping it afloat, regardless of how much it might inconvenience or enrage the other passengers? Is it possible that those who have been demonized for uttering so-called seditious words are in some way assisting our country, whether for right or wrong, giving us a perspective that we may have otherwise overlooked?

Perhaps the freedom of speech amendment is First because the ability to speak openly is largely what it means to be American. The paradox is that the most outspoken polemicist can be both courageously loyal and yet demonized as a traitor. In fact, two true patriots can present diametrically opposed arguments at the same time. Parrots, on the other hand, have only one general line.

Secondly, is the "war on terror" really a war, and how does this impact freedom of speech? Traditionally, wars are armed conflicts between sovereign states; now we have declared war on an emotion, terror. Our soldiers are fighting and dying, but because the war is against "terror," it can never end. Terror, like drugs and poverty, cannot be entirely eliminated. Since the battle cannot end, does our silence never end? Can we never again speak against U.S. policy?

Thirdly, is it possible that slurs directed at individuals for their "lack of patriotism" are nothing more than political maneuvers, meant to gain power and discredit one's opponents? Democrats also use this tactic against Republicans, such as when Michael Moore said, "They are not patriots. They are hate-riots."

Yet, Republicans are viewed as the more patriotic party, thus enjoy greater success with this marginalizing technique. We should beware of suspicious labels and partisan motives that relegate ones political adversaries to the enemy's cave, to a conspiratorial pact with Bin Laden.

For each individual whose speech is targeted, there are no doubt hundreds, if not thousands, who censor innovative thoughts before attempting to offer them in the marketplace of ideas.

The next time you hear the word "unpatriotic" or "un-American" tossed about, do not accept. Question. Think about censorship and self-censorship. Think about whether you want our country to have a staple menu of bread and water or one listing many flavorful dishes.

Think about whether you believe in Voltaire's idea, "I may disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it" or Ari Fleisher's idea that all Americans should "watch what they say" in this time of crisis.

Think about whether you want a land of parrots or one of patriots.

Charlotte Laws, Ph.D. is a syndicated columnist, a member of the Greater Valley Glen Council and the president of the League for Earth and Animal Protection (LEAP). Her political website is http://www.CharlotteLaws.org


MORE RESOURCES:

More hypocrisy in politics
Edmonton Sun,  Canada - 26 minutes ago
If someone's personal life rather than his politics leads that person to vote a certain way on a specific issue surely we have a right to know. ...


Evangelical group seeks separation of religion from politics
Salt Lake Tribune, United States - 3 hours ago
A group of prominent US evangelical Christians is urging other Evangelicals to step back from partisan politics and avoid becoming ''useful idiots'' for any ...


IN INDIAN POLITICS ANYTHING CAN HAPPEN - Sent By : Nariman_789
NDTV.com, India - 2 hours ago
In Indian politics, anything can happen. So the latest one of the Congress cosying up with Samajwadi Party is no surprise. The Parties in India it seems ...


Andhra politics to get a new star cast
Economic Times, India - 11 hours ago
It is no secret that people in Andhra Pradesh treat film stars as demi-gods, so taking a plunge into politics is a cake walk for film stars. ...


KIDK

Polar bear politics hurt Inuit
Globe and Mail, Canada - 42 minutes ago
Ottawa -- While Canada's independent science body, the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife, has assessed the polar bear as being of "special ...
Video: Polar Bears On Thin Ice (CBS News) CBS
Inhofe Says Listing of Polar Bear Based on Politics, Not Science Trading Markets (press release)
google news commentComment by Carl Pope Executive Director, Sierra Club
Canada Free Press - Hamilton Spectator
all 1,790 news articles


Polar bear politics hurt Inuit
Globe and Mail, Canada - 42 minutes ago
Your editorial on the US decision to list the polar bear as threatened (Burying Our Heads In The Snow - May 15) insults the significant knowledge Inuit have ...


Wall Street Journal

In Taiwan, the Politics of Art
Wall Street Journal - 5 hours ago
Using the museum to promote Taiwanese identity, she says, is purely "politics." The pan-Asian theme of the museum extension reflects concerns shared by many ...


Athletes, not politics, define Olympics
Yahoo! News - 1 hour ago
I was raised in the 1960s by parents who were the third generation of African-American civil rights leaders. In those turbulent times, my brothers and I ...


Intriguing party politics at this year's festival
Winnipeg Sun, Canada - 2 hours ago
By BRUCE KIRKLAND CANNES -- The party scene here is morphing into something a little strange, and hugely diminished, but maybe it's just good riddance to ...


On Politics Ho Hum, It’s Just Another Senate Race
New York Times, United States - 5 hours ago
And with the Democratic race still not settled, the first topic in any discussion about Washington politics will always be about the presidential race. ...

Politics - Google News

home | site map
© 2006